have questions about why Queen Elizabeth had Mary Queen of Scots executed.
did it mainly because Mary would not command her followers to cease
attacks/rebellions (such as the Earl's Rebellion) which claimed many lives.
The last life that was lost during that rebellion was Mary's and that put a stop to the rebellions.
which was covered up took place in London itself. Nearly 700 were laid
out dead in front of Queen Elizabeth 'on the
green' by about 75 tower warders in about 10 minutes time using halberds. The
queen's regular guard had been sent off chasing after some assassins
and the warders were the second string. Spies had warned the guards at the castle so they sent the
The rebels had to hide their arms to keep them secret
and that meant they had mostly knives, several shields and about 10
swords which gave those 10 a reach of about 5
and 1/2 feet. The halberds of the Tower warders had one added section
which provided an 18 foot long handle, with about a 20 foot reach. You
do the math.
That is why only one warder was killed and only two were wounded.
Mary would have been killed long before the rebels had gotten anywhere near setting her free and she knew
that. So did the rebels, that is why they did not try to free her and
that is why they attacked Queen Elizabeth with murder being their intent.
Nothing was written about this rebellion in order to avoid inspiring others to do the
same. However mentions of it have snuck into publications, now and again.
Mary knew all along that the rebels were poorly equipped and too small
a force to win. Though they
Awere doomed from the start Mary was bored and thought
the fun and excitement it supplied was worth it. She had grown a
little mad but not nearly
so mad as to think they could have won. Others in her family had been unkind and even
never so totally heartless as she was.
For some reason both these issues are seen by almost all women as a
much greater and
intolerable evil which cannot be resolved and should never be endured.
I understand that history says that Queen Elizabeth did
not make the decision to have Mary executed:
Burghley was keener than Elizabeth on taking robust action with
Scotland, and on having allegedly dispatched Mary
Queen of Scots'
death warrant without Elizabeth's express command, was excluded from
court for some time. Many believe, however, that Elizabeth simply
couldn't handle her own complicity in the death of another monarch. PBS
what gives? Queen Elizabeth was terrified of the Scots for the simple
reason that they were as gullible as hell. They would get told one
was the cause of all their problems and they would all go off the deep
end to murder that one person. As far as I knew it would only
happen if they only got one person in their sights. If two or more
people were thought to be the problem they were totally helpless. That
is the history
of the Scots (a long time ago). At least once a year they would get a
priest that they would proclaim as being the savior of the world and it
all rested with that one person. Actually it was about every 2 years
they came up with one of them. It made life interesting. Did any of
them make it into the history book?
Mary did not tell them to stop and that is why Queen Elizabeth
said 'yes' when Lord Burghley suggested removing Mary's head.
So by making it appear that the responsibility for the beheading was
only partly Queen Elizabeth's fault it completely defused the anger of the Scots.
Do you want to see exactly
what the Yeoman Warders might have done (about 40% of them at least) if
you jerked them around 400 years ago about their bright red 'dress like' uniforms like you may
have already done?
The halberds when used properly were the smoothest deadly dance I ever
saw. The warders would swing them around and around over their heads.
The broad light
blades of the flat thin English halberd was much different and had a lot
more area than 'war' halberds. They were able to provide lift like a helicopter
blade which kept them in the air while spinning them around in a big circle.
The halberd on the right is from Queen
Mary's Black Watch Guard- It's not a copy. The halberds of the Tower
warders had a larger but different shape blade in the back so it would balance out the lift provided by the front blade.
Otherwise they are very similar. You can easily see how the slightly
turned top blade would add lift while being spun around by the
warder (just like when you were a child and you put your hand
out the car window). The top blade would provide all the lift that
was needed and the ax blade would remain in a totally flat trajectory
so it would not be deflected when it someone. It would slice right
through a neck, behead a person, stay airborne, make another circle and
two seconds later cut off another head, etc, etc until there was no one standing except the man holding the halberd.
Often several warders would overlap each others spinning blades
and would alternate swinging them over each others head like the blades
in an egg beater. In the massacre of the 700 they did just that and
each one also had about 4 warders on one knee beneath his spinning
halberd who used their halberds as spears.
The most fascinating mob dispersal I ever saw was a riot of 200 being
chased down a 70 foot wide street by two warders with one halberd each
on a 25 foot shaft whose slowly rotating blades made two overlapping 50
foot circles that came within inches of the buildings on each side of
the road. They had what was identical to a leather dog leash which had
the loop over their one wrist and when they targeted someone they would
let go of the handle and the spinning halberd would extend another 6-10
feet for a half a second and then they would snap on the leash and pull back the halberd, then grab
the shaft. There would be another ripped apart person on the ground and
the halberd would still be spinning in a 50 foot circle. It took a lot
of strength to do that so they were given lots of beef to build muscles. So earning their beefeater nickname.
Here you can see one halberd on a 20' pole (left center) in this photo taken in a museum. Nope. Never
mind, those are just pikes. However, somewhere I have a print from an
old woodcut showing extremely long handled halberds. I'll try to locate it for this page.
To my knowledge they were not called beefeaters at the time but they got all the
beef they wanted. Queen Elizabeth's court would come to a halt if they
ran out of beef before they got another supply. Then we actually had to go find
a cow for them. I always knew where to find one within 5 miles of the
tower and for a good price. They needed the extra strength that it gave
them to twirl those halberds around in 30' circles.
stables where I grew up was nearly in the
shadow of the Tower of London (at times it actually was). I think I
have it marked right on this map. The tower is at the bottom left with
the moat around it.
The warders came
to the field near the stables to practice. In good weather every
day they would be out in the field, up to 4 at a time, spinning
halberds in beautiful overlapping patterns making an amazing
choreographed dance with the long handle halberds. They would use
walnuts on a pole as targets to practice on for cutting off a mans
head. Each walnut being aproximately the size of a man's vertebre.
Usually they would hit 10 out 10 walnuts at 12 feet (using a short
I thought it was some kind of amazing dance with long sticks from the
age 5 until 8. It looked very much like batons that cheerleaders twirl combined
with synchronized swimming.
think they had three styles of halberds. The design I am
describing was the long range halberds that needed the space to
with that the field provided. Those were more like 'sniper rifles'.
were not what they normally stood
guard with. They practiced using the close range halberds at the tower
and not in the big field but I never saw them practicing with them.
Those were the equal of a handgun. The third halberds was for armor and
it was essentially a over sized can opener for opening up knight's
and usually it had the addition of a hook for pulling them off their
horses. These served the same purpose as todays anti tank
They had about five sub types of anti-armor halberds. Some
were for Spanish knights. The lower half of Spanish amour was loose
fitting but it fit together tightly when in the saddle. It formed a
kind of basket which supported the knight during long rides. It was
made of a
tough steel so you had to go under it like at the arms or else knock
them off the horse first and then go in between the lower
halbert was for French foot soldiers. Their armor had the metal bound
so you had to cut the leather first to get between the metal pieces.
German armor was to tight to get in between so you had to make
lots of small holes with a thin needle point on a special halberd. What
finally used on German armor was a type of heavy pollaxe with a 5
handle and a sharp 10 pound head. This was used to chop off one of
disjoint a leg or
just crumble their armor at the knee backwards.
Swiss collection of halberds (left) is so varied because they were
surrounded by all those countries. They needed the largest number of halberd styles.
Each blade of these 'can openers' were for defeating the armor of a
certain country. Since they might end up fighting several or all of
countries in one battle they had halberds that had up to 5 different
blades such as those toward the right.
Hence you will often see the same or very similar style halberds being
used by all the countries in an area except for one. That one country
is whose specific armor that particular style of halberd
was developed to defeat.
can see about a dozen kinds of the best halberds and one lance that the
warders had for a little party called the
execution of the Earl of Essex in the picture to the right. It looks
like they may have been expecting some party crashers from Ireland and
Scotland costumed in both heavy and light armor.
it's obvious they were not expecting the crashers to ride in on horses
they would have brought
several bills (left) to the little Earl of Essex affair. Bills had a
hook on them for pulling men, armoured or not, off of horses and then
using that 'spear point' to pry open the armor and stab the person. The
knob looking thing
on the top looks like it may have had a several inch long needle in it
which could penetrate the toughest armor. Due to serations in the
needle it would act like a harpoon by which the knight could be pulled
down. (A needle was often used on them but I can't tell if this was one
without looking at it close up.) Alternately the Bill was used to
hook the throat of the knights horse and that way if the man quickly
pulled the horse backwards and sideways it would cause the horse to
fall down on top of the knight which trapped him. This was important if
you wanted to keep the knight alive and well to ransom him to back to his
family, which was the custom.
See the Agincourt page for the exception to this.
That is really what happened.
In the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica
they fall just short of asking the question themselves 'what was the
Bill used for?' when they explain everything else about it such as
descriptions of several bills and how many were used in specific
battles. They just don't seem to know what it was used for and how it
The halberd at the bottom right (of the picture right) looks like a bit like the queen was there
with her personal guards (compare it with the halberd above of the
black watch guard). I was there and I can tell you this: it was a messy beheading. The axeman
actually aims to chop between the vertebrae and usually is 100%. The
first swing however hit the Earl's shoulder as well and that took took most
of the blow but it did sever the spine. The second missed him completely
and finally the third hit the neck square on.
How did the axeman suddenly become inaccurate? It started a week before the execution.
It was a very interesting look that that Queen Elizabeth gave me when I suggested
that she get the Earl's own wood chopper/gardener/forester to chop his head off. The wood cutter had
been involved, I think, in turning in the Earl and he did it in part for
violating his own two daughters, one at the age of 8. When the Earl convicted himself with his own
braggart's words the wood choppers testimony was not needed but he was still in town. I told
Elizabeth he would probably pay her to chop off the Earl's head. She was taken aback by the novel
idea of someone actually paying her money since she was the one that did the paying.
(Maybe the queen
did take my advice. Maybe that was the wood chopper and he
made the execution into a slow torture for his own pleasure. Severing
the spine prevent a person from breathing so they suffocate to death.
Then he only partly cut an artery and the blood squirted sideways far
out in the audience. That is why I said it was messy. Does anyone know
who the executioner was?) Also, there were reports that an enemy of the
condemned often bribed the regular executioner to 'take his time'.
Once when I was almost 9 years old the bells at the tower all rang at
once. This was the equivalent of a 911 call in the 16th century. It had always been
because of a fire at the tower so my sister and I went to watch them put it out.
It was only two blocks to the Thames then a right turn to the main gate. There
were people running back and forth like they did when there were fires
but this time it was different. It's hard to explain in detail so let
me show you this diagram and let your imagination fill in the rest.
the red line to see how we walked to the tower. I'm in the lavender
colored dress (I got a doll of Catherine of Aragon to play me), My sister is in
the red dress and she is older (that's Jane Seymore's doll playing her). The
tower warders were always so nice to us that I got a teddy bear warder
Follow the blue line and that was the escape route of the two
'kidnappers for ransom' who dropped from the wall and then ran to close
to the warder. I got a doll of Shakespeare and his twin to play the two criminals. (He got
credit for my plays so he deserves being a criminal. All models were taken without even attempting to get authorization from the Royal Palace shop which I am very grateful for the use of.) Click for a large version of the escape and 16th century picture of the tower.
This was the first time I ever saw a halberd used as it was intended and it was on those men who were
actually escaping from the tower, see the blue line. I was later told by one warder that,
'they were thieves so young lady you should never steal'.
It horrified me beyond belief when those two men ran about 12 feet in front of the warder who was on guard at that
station. Suddenly both prisoners fell down with two swipes of his
halberd. Their bodies were so chopped up that were dead within
about five seconds since the warders knew exactly where to cut the
arteries so that a man bleed out in ten seconds, five seconds if their hearts were
pumping fast from running.
The warder did not even move from where he was standing guard. He just
put one foot out and leaned forward in one long reach with his halberd on it's 8 foot
staff. Those men had thought they were completely safe being 12 feet away.
He took them out and still had 3 more feet of reach left. He had
done it all without ever moving his other foot. Then he stood right back up quickly, wiped the blood off his halberd and then went
right back to standing at attention like a statue. I guess he stood up stiff in
case any other escapees came along they would think little of him and
get caught in the same trap.
Two seconds is
all it took for the warder. The two men bled profusely but one of them had parts of
his body spread out half the way to the river. For about 10 seconds I
was in total disbelief of what had happened. It's still confusing and
it may be that it was just one man who was cut into many pieces.
However, what I thought I saw was the warder chop
two innocent people to death just like we would swat two flies but even faster. Where are they buried? As I recall.
I screamed hysterically for 20 minutes. My cousin forgot right away
what had just happened right in front of us. She completely blocked it out for the rest of her life and I was envious of
someone for the first time in my life.
Until then I had not even thought of halberds as weapons. I
just thought the warders were playing a sort of game with long
Hey, they gave us gifts and
meat for our meals so with their gray beards I thought of them like you
did Santa Claus when you were really young.
Then one day in a split second all the Saint Nicks in England plunge my Utopian
world into a pre Gothic 16th century version of...
might notice that most of the men in the bards plays often had a deadly
quality that belies the actual outward projection of harmonious
masculinity. That deadlyness occasionally comes out with deadly consequences. In
other words all the men in those plays either suddenly change into Freddy Krugers or at least
you know that they can.
This is where all those men in those plays came from. They are clones of the warders of the
Tower of London.
I have to admit as you must too, without those men the plays would be
about as boring as the 'Biblical passion plays' of that era.
All rights reserved. © J Pinil, Inc. 2006-7