Sex and the Single
Why of all the forefathers is Ben
Franklin the only one who seemed to have a randy bone in his body?
It's England's fault. They were looking
for any moral travesty to justify an invasion and so were the French and Germans.
There were only a few ways they could legally invade the US according international
laws and the moral clause was the major one they were trying for most of all.
I think India was invaded by the British based on their supposed lack of morality.
Many of the upper class of England had far worse morality than did the people
of India who were simply open about their sexuality. It became necessary for the big
powers to hide all their perverts just so they could claim the moral high ground
which would allow them to take over other countries..
Nobody wanted to have the English
return so anything provocative was kept out of the papers. Ben Franklin had a team of men who
wandered around to the various newspapers and to basically anyone with a printing
press. They made it clear that if the English returned then they would be forced into printing for them. They 'might likely' be seen as turncoats and not make it to England
while still breathing. That was all it took. The 'while still breathing' part
meant that we did not even want their bodies in America and they would be sent to
England as a warning to the English. Well that is how close an invasion was
for about 30 years
The following is the only reason
I now have for exposing the sexual information you will find on this web site. Today's political leaders are
expected to live up to the ideal of the prudish forefathers which didn't
exist. It must be frustrating for today's politicians. They have no flexibility
in their lifestyle and it seems to be impossible for them to ever enjoy the
freedoms that the rest of Americans enjoy. Yet Americans also want these same politicians
to fight for their freedom. It's the biggest hypocrisy I've seen in modern America.
I hear mainly two rational's for this
restriction Americans place on their leaders. They place the bar at a level
relative to the behavior of both people in the Bible (selectively chosen) and
the forefathers of this country.
Because of both confusion and intolerance
too often these well meaning people think of the two groups as the same and
expect their politicians to be saints. If a politician acts like a saint then there
will be a waiting group of competing politicians with a cross and someone selling
A leader really can't give you what
they don't have to give. If the American people restrict them until they are
unhappy then their politicians are not going to care about their constituents happiness.
Would you if you were in their place?
So I can do something about the second
category by exposing what was kept from the papers at least as far as some of
the escapades of Thomas Jefferson are concerned.
I won't try to change you. What I
will do is tell you the truth about the forefathers and you will change yourself.
Then maybe you will allow a few infractions of morality like you want them to
allow you. If you allow your politicians some leeway in the future like the
French do then they will want to support your freedoms a lot more.
Addition information about sex can
be found on the following pages. The Widow, Alligators
and the Third President, The Great Seal fiasco,
about the Presidents Residence and last the page involving
more sex than all the others Paris in the 1700s, after
Ben Franklin was out of the National
government at this time which started in the 1780's and so whatever he did or whatever
got reported had no direct effect. So the English could not use his reputation
or actions against us.
I would not have minded the reputation
as I certainly deserved it and the lady friends that it would have attracted. I was
a widower and I was open about those issues. Did you think that after my wife
died that I had queer fancies or forgot that my wand was useful for something
other than writing my name with in the snow?
The forefathers were not inhibited or they
would have been happy with English rule. Then you would not have an United
States of America from where you can safely stand and complain when others wave
their own magic wands when we all know it is because they don't have one to wave.*
The limited information you have
was sanitized for British consumption and to keep us free. It would not be right
for me to get into the moral beliefs of these great men in any case. That was
for them to do in their time and if their wishes are to be honored it should
be allowed to stay the way it is.
I'll only show you one proof that
what I say is true. The front of the Great Seal as designed by Thomas Jefferson
was found acceptable. If you look at it closely
That impish eye is peeking at two
of the most shapely girls ever seen in America at the time. They are Hugh Hefner
style DD ladies in shear chiffon gowns that cling in all the right, but politically
incorrect, places. This side of the seal was approved by all but two members
of the entire Continental Congress.
I doubt there have been many if any
proposals that have been approved in congress by so wide a margin since then. So
most of the forefathers had that party animal in them whether they were married
or exercised the right to party.
Ben's design on the other side was
rejected and saved us from further drudgery like this. For the details about
the Great Seal.
*It's not sexist. If they have a
wand then it doesn't have any magic in it. They don't have any because they try to oppress others who have it. It's a tantric thing. The empowerment that woke up the French to their oppression after four hundred years of no rebellions.
© 2004-8 John